​​​​​​​<< ​​5-Waters Volume 2 - Water Supplies
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​<< ​​Springfield Water Supply​​​

​23   ​Springston Water Supply


23.1       Scheme Summary​


Description​ Quantity
Estimated Population Served ​549

Scheme Coverage

(1 Jan 2021)​

Full Charges188
Half Charges0
>1 Charges1
System Components ​​ ​​ ​​ ​
Bores/Intakes (No.)1 Bore
Treatment/Disinfection1
Reservoirs (No.)
3
Pump Stations (No.)1
Piped (m)7,071
HistoryOriginal scheme installation date1969
Value ($) ​
Replacement Cost$1,229,603
Depreciated Replacement Cost$693,130
FinancialOperator cost (scheduled and reactive maintenance) per connection
$325.11/connection

Demand (m3)

(1 Jan – 31 Dec 2020)

​​ ​​ ​
Average daily162
Peak daily457
Minimum daily-
Average daily per connection0.81
Type of Supply 
High pressure and unrestricted
Target Pressure & Flow at boundary ​
Pressure>350kPa
Flow>15L/min
SustainabilityWell SecuritySecure

​​​​​ 

23.2       Key Issues

The following key issues are associated with the Springston water supply. A list of district wide issues are located in 5Waters Activity Management Plan: Volume 1.

Table 23-1 Springston Scheme Issues

​​What's the problem
​What we plan to do

​Catchment management

To encompass a holistic view of the drinking water supply, improved liaison with ECan and study of ground water quality within the water supply protection zones are being investigated.

​Bore pump failure

​As there is no supply redundancy for this network, a preventive maintenance programme for submersible pumps will be developed and implemented.

​Emergency chlorination

To allow on-demand chlorination as a result of a treatment or storage transgression or contamination event, provision for emergency chlorination is currently being planned for the scheme.​


23.3       Overview & History

The Springston Water Supply provides untreated groundwater to the Springston community located approximately 5kms west of Lincoln.  Properties within the township originally obtained their domestic water from shallow bores until contamination of the groundwater presumably by septic tanks necessitated installation of a community water supply in 1969. The Springston scheme was designed as an unrestricted supply complying with the NZ Fire Fighting Code of Practice. 

In 2005 the pump station was upgraded in order to supply three new subdivisions, and the water tower was removed.

A new deep (>100m) bore was brought into service in 2008 to address water quality issues.  The old well, also at Mather Place has been decommissioned. 

​​​
​​ Figure 23-1
SPRINGSTON Water - Scheme map

Open larger map: 'Water Scheme'

Springston - Scheme Schematic.png

Figure 23‑2 Scheme Schematic


23.4​       System Capacity

There is adequate supply capacity to meet current and projected demands for this community. 

Table 23‑2 Capacity Summary

 ​

Flow Rate (L/s)

Daily Volume (m3)

Annual Volume (m3)

Comments
Abstraction Capacity16.71443-One bore pump
Consented Take15900135,000 *CRC010895.1
Peak Demand17.3 **843 **78,300 

​*  inferred value, **Jan 2015

​​

23.5       Resource Consents

The Springston water supply has a number of resource consents. 

Table 23‑3 Resource Consents

Consent​

Description Location Date Issued Expiry Date Consented Max Instantaneous Flow (L/s) Consented Max Daily Volume (m3/day)

CRC010895.1



To take and use groundwater.Ellesmere Junction Road, SPRINGSTON4-Dec-0831-Jan-3515900

 

23.6       Water Quality

The Springston water supply is a secure source and is currently sampled twice weekly at the treatment plant and weekly in the reticulation zone.

The following details E. coli transgressions for the period 2012 to 2020.  

Treatment

There have been no E. coli treatment transgressions during this period.

Zone

There have been two E. coli transgressions during this period, these occurred in March 2015 and June 2016.​

Chemical Analysis

The following is a summary of the raw water chemical analysis carried out at the Springston Water Supply.  

Table 23‑4 Springston Water Raw Water Chemical Analysis Summary

Parameter​​

Standards
2008
​2011
​2013
201520172018​
​2019
Status
Total Lead (g/m3)0.01 (Maximum Acceptable Value)
​<0.00010
​<0.00011
​0.00068
<0.00011

<0.00011​<0.00011
​<0.00011

pH (pH units)7-8.5 (Guideline Value)
​7.8
​7.8
7.7​7.97.8​7.7
​7.8

Total Hardness (g/m3 as CaCO3)<200 (Guideline Value)
​45
​52
​51
50
48.9
​49.5
​48.7

Total Calcium (g/m3)n/v​15
​17.5
​17
16.6
16.37​16.72
​16.22
Total Iron  (g/m3)<0.2 (Guideline Value)
​<0.02
​<0.021
​<0.021
<0.021<0.021​<0.021
​<0.021
Total Sodium (g/m3)<200 (Guideline Value)
​8
​8.9
​8.9
9.3
8.68
​8.62
​9.00
Nitrate - Nitrogen (g/m3)11.3 (Maximum Acceptable Value)
​1.3
​1.46
​1.51
1.61
1.72
​1.71
​1.80

​ 

23.7       Scheme Assets

A summary of material and diameter for pipes in Springston is shown below in Figure 23‑3 and Figure 23‑4.

Figure 23‑3 Pipe Material – Springston


​Figure 23‑4  Pipe Diameter – Springston

 

23.8       Operational Management

The water supply is operated and maintained under two maintenance contracts as follows:

  • Contract 1241: Water Services Contract.  Contract is with SICON who undertakes investigations, conditions inspections, proactive and reactive maintenance and minor asset renewals; and
  • Contract 1202: Parks and Reserves Contract.  Contract is with SICON who undertakes the maintenance of land scape features related to water services e.g. mowing, gardens etc.

Water quality sampling is completed under an agreement with Food and Health Ltd as required.

 

23.9       Photos of Main Assets


Springston - Photo 1 Bore headworks and reservoirs.jpg
Photo 1: Bore headworks and reservoirs


V2 Springston - Photo 2 Pump Shed.jpeg

Photo 2: Pump Shed

 

23.10       Risk Assessment

A risk assessment has been undertaken for the Springston scheme. The key output from the risk assessment is the identification of any extreme and high risks which need to be mitigated. In order to mitigate these risks they have been included and budgeted for in the projects within this LTP. Table 23‑5 details the risk priority rating, Table 23‑6 outlines the risks and the list of key projects is found in Table 23‑11.

Table 23‑5 Risk Priority Rating

Risk Score​ Level of Risk Risk Response
> 50Extreme

Awareness of the event to be reported to Council. 

Urgent action to eliminate / mitigate / manage the risk.

Document risk and action in the AMP.

35-50Very HighRisk to be eliminated / mitigated / managed through normal business planning processes with responsibility assigned.
14-35HighManage risk using routine procedures.
3.5-14ModerateMonitor the risk.
< 3.5
Low

Awareness of the event to be reported to Council. 

Immediate action required to eliminate / mitigate / manage the risk.

Document risk and action in the AMP.


Table 23‑6 Risks – Springston

Risk​ Action/Project Year Identified 2014 Risk Rating 2017 Risk Rating Residual Risk Rating
Noisy pump shedLook at means to reduce noise volumes2014444
Electrical failure due to lightning or network spikesInstall surge diverters2014
101010
Failure to meet NES water meter standardsNES Water Meter Compliance20142066
Inability to collect income from non-metered propertiesInstall property water meters2014270.60.6
Non-compliance with the DWSNZDWSNZ - Age Testing2014100.70.7
Non-compliance with the DWSNZDWSNZ - Bore-head security2014101010
Non-consented activitiesRenewal of consents201427276
Scheme efficienty / redundancy Join Springfield to Lincoln or Rolleston2017 20.7


The list of district wide risks can be found in 5Waters Activity Management Plan: Volume 1.


23.11       Asset Valuation Details

The total replacement value of assets within the Springston water scheme is $1,229,603 with further details in Table 23‑7 below.

Table 23‑7 Replacement Value, Springston

Asset Class 1​ Asset Class 2 Sum of Replacement Value
Plant and Equipment ​$351,816
Water Reticulation ​​ ​​ ​​ ​
Hydrant$30,447
Lateral$90,289
Pipe$571,850
Supply Point$150,000
Valve$35,199


23.12       Renewals

The renewal profile has been taken from the 2019 5 Waters Valuation. A graph showing the renewals for this scheme are shown by Figure 23‑5 below. The majority of renewals are due now.

​Figure 23‑5 Springston Water Renewal Profile

 

23.13       Critical Assets

The criticality model for Springston has been updated for the 2021 AcMP. The methodology of the criticality model can be found in 5Waters Activity Management Plan: Volume 1 and it provides details of how the criticality has been calculated for the reticulation assets. Table 23‑8 and Figure 23‑6 below shows the calculated criticality for all of the assets within this scheme that have a recorded known length.

Table 23‑8 Length of Assets per Criticality Level

Criticality Bands​​ Length (m)
5
Low4,207
4
Medium-Low1,654
3
Medium1,231
2
Medium-High154​
1
High0


​​​
​​ Figure 23-6
SPRINGSTON Water - Criticality map

Open larger map: 'Water Criticality'


23.14       Asset Condition

The asset condition model was run for Springston in 2021. The methodology of the model can be found in 5Waters Activity Management Plan: Volume 1 which provides details of how the model has been calculated for the pipe reticulation assets. Figure 23‑7 below shows the level of asset condition for these assets within this scheme that have a recorded known condition.

​​​
​​ Figure 23-7
SPRINGSTON Water - Condition map

Open larger map: 'Water Condition'

Table 23‑9 provides a description of the condition rating used within the condition model.

Table 23‑9 Asset Condition Grading

Condition Rating​ Grading
1.0Excellent
2.0Good
3.0Moderate
4.0Poor
5.0+Fail

 

The number of pipe faults is also measured through the asset management system. Figure 23‑8 shows the known historic pipe failures within this scheme.

​​​
​​ Figure 23-8
SPRINGSTON Water - Pipe Faults map

Open larger map: 'Water Pipe Faults'

​​​​

23.15       Funding Program

The 10 year budgets are shown by Table 23-10​. Bu​dgets are split into expenditure, renewals, projects and capital projects. Expenditure and renewals have been reported on a district-wide basis in Volume 1. 

All figures are ($) not adjusted for CPI “inflation".  They are calculated on historical data, and population growth where relevant.​

Table 23-10 Budget Summary

Years Projects Capital Projects
2021/2022 -
 $20,000
2022/2023
 -
 -
2023/2024 -
 -
2024/2025 -
 $400,000
2025/2026 -
 -
2026/2027 -
 -
2027/2028 -
2028/2029
 -
 -
2029/2030
 -
 -
2031/2032
 -
 -
Total -
 $420,000

An explanation of the categories within the budgets are as follows below:

  • Expenditure consists of operation and maintenance costs;
  • Renewals are replacement of assets which are nearing or exceeded their useful life;
  • Projects are investigations, decisions and planning activities which exclude capital works; and
  • Capital projects are activities involving physical works.

Table ​23-11 Key Projects​​

Account Label GL Description​  Year 1($)  Year 2($)  Year 3($) Years 4 to 10 Funding Split *
​Capital Projects​
-
Connect to Lincoln/Rolleston/second source
 -
-
-
$400,000
TBC
​Capital Projects
​-
​Additional pressure sensors to be added into the network
​$20,000
​-
-
​-
​100% LoS

 * Where LoS refers to Level of Service and G refers to Growth

The list of district wide projects can be found in 5Waters Activity Management Plan: Volume 1.

Discussion on Projects

Projects​​​ have been determined based on their:

  • Relevance to the scheme
  • Requirement to be completed under legislation
  • Ability to bring the scheme up to or maintain the Level of Service required under council's Asset Management Policy. 

Many projects are jointly funded by more than one scheme and activity.  Each scheme pays a pro-rata share only, equivalent to the number of connections.

Discussion on Capital and Projects

Where relevant, Capital (Levels of Service) and Capital (Growth) projects have been included in the scheme financial details. 

Levels of Service Projects and growth splits have been provided to ensure the costs of population driven works are clear.​​​​​


<< ​​5-Waters Volume 2 - Water Supplies
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​<< ​​Springfield Water Supply​​​