​​​​​​​​​​<< ​​5-Waters-Volume-3-Wastewater
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​<< ​​Darfield and Kirwee Wastewater Scheme​​​​
Eastern Selwyn Sewerage Scheme​​ >>​​​

​​​​5   Doyleston Wastewater Scheme


5.1       Scheme Summary


Description​
Quantity
Estimated Population Served ​357

Scheme Coverage

(1 Jan 2021)

​​ ​​
Full Charges
113
Half Charges6
>1 Charges4
System  Components ​​ ​​ ​​ ​
Piped (m)6,470
Manholes (No.)34
Pump Stations (No.)3
TreatmentN/A (conveyed to Ellesmere STP)
DisposalN/A (conveyed to Ellesmere STP)
HistoryOriginal scheme installation date1996
Value ($) ​
Replacement Cost$2,025,568
Depreciated Replacement Cost$1,541,295
Financial
Operator cost (scheduled and reactive maintenance) per connection

$380.87/connection

Demand ​​ ​​ ​​ ​
(1 Jan - 31 Dec 2020)
Annually (m3)
91,578
Average daily (m3)250.9
Peak daily (m3)860
Minimum daily (m3)-
InfiltrationYes
SustainabilityUltimate discharge pointConveyed to Ellesmere WWTP

 

5.2       Key Issues

The following key issues are associated with the Doyleston Wastewater Scheme.  A list of district wide issues are located in 5Waters Activity Management Plan: Volume 1.

Table 5‑1 Doyleston Scheme Issues

What's the Problem​ What we plan to do
Potential for future infiltration issues as scheme agesMonitor groundwater levels and daily flows.  Investigate issues as required

 

5.3       Overview & History

The reticulation was installed in the township in 1996 and replaced a variety of disposal systems i.e. septic tanks (with disposal to adjacent drains) and chemical toilets.  High groundwater levels during winter made disposal via standard soak holes difficult and there was a significant amount of discharge to local waterways.  The trunk mains are located at the back of properties.

The wastewater from properties is reticulated to a central pump station in Doyleston, and then pumped approximately 2.8 km to Leeston wastewater treatment plant.

​​​
​​ Figure 5-1
DOYLESTON Sewer - Scheme map

Open larger map: 'Sewer Scheme'


V3 Scheme Schematic.png

Figure 5‑2 Scheme Schematic



Figure 5‑3 Doyleston Master Plan


V3 Doyleston - Pump Station Failure Map.jpg

Figure 5‑4 Pump Station Failure Map

 

5.4       System Capacity

The scheme is operating within operating limits.  Refer to section 5.6.3 for design information.  Pump and pressure main upgrades will be required to provide for additional capacity for growth.

Master Plan upgrades are provided in Figure 5‑3. 

 V3 Doyleston - Wet Weather Flow Capacity Map.jpg

Figure 5‑5 Wet Weather Flow Capacity Map


5.5       Resource Consents

Doyleston township is part of the Ellesmere scheme. Therefore, all wastewater is pumped to the Ellesmere Treatment Plant located in Leeston. The resource consents required for this treatment plant are in the Ellesmere section of this plan.

 

5.6       Scheme Assets

A summary of the assets within this scheme is outlined in this section.


5.6.1   Reticulation Overview

A summary of material and diameter for pipes is shown in Figure 5‑6 and Figure 5‑7.

Figure 5‑6 Pipe Material – Doyleston


​Figure 5‑7 Pipe Diameter – Doyleston

 

5.6.2   Treatment and Disposal

No treatment is carried out with all wastewater pumped to Leeston.


5.6.3   Design

The original design data for the Doyleston system is tabled below.

Table 5‑2 Design Data

Design Population​

Per Capita Flow

L/per/day

Peak Day Flow

m3/day

Household Population​

persons

Pump capacity l/s
32010003202.73.50


The Doyleston, scheme is ultimately limited by the capacity of the Leeston WWTP, which in turn is bound by the resource consents for discharging from the works.  This is also the case with Leeston and Southbridge Schemes.  These schemes therefore need to be considered collectively in determining future capacity for growth in the three schemes.

Pump and pressure main upgrades will be required to provide for additional capacity for growth.

Master Plan upgrades are provided in Figure 5‑3. 

 

5.6.4   Pump Statio​ns

There are three pump stations within the Doyleston scheme, with the main pump station pumping to the Leeston WWTP.  Details are tabled below.

Table 5‑3 Pump Station

Site Name​ Wet well dimensions Wet Well area (m2) Wet Well Depth (m) No of pumps Pump curve used Recorded Flow (L/s) Model Pump Rate (L/s) ADWF (L/s) PDWF (L/s)
Doyleston (S) Main2000 Ø3.132Flygt FP3124 SH246 7.4 kW540.80.17
Doyleston (S) Minor1200 Ø1.12.51Flygt CP3057 260 2.4 kWN/A50.070.17
Doyleston (S) Greenan Pl1400 Ø1.542Flygt CP3068 251 2.4 kWN/A30.030.08

 

Table 5‑4 Pump Station Storage Time Analysis

Pump Station​ Town Morning Peak Time PS off time Hours until HLA reached Hours until first spill Spill Level (m AD) Spill Location – Model ID
Doyleston (S) MainDoyleston9:008:308.711.515.0324214
Doyleston (S) MinorDoyleston9:008:3027.63219.293408
Doyleston (S) Greenan PlaceDoyleston9:008:302528.515.30880926

 

5.6.5   Rising Mains

Table 5‑5 Rising Main Overview

Site Name​ Material Pressure Rating Internal diameter (mm) Comment
Doyleston PS to Cunningham rising mainPVCUPN12100/80Assumed Pressure Rating
Doyleston (S) Greenan PSMDPEPN12.551 
Doyleston (S) Minor PSPVCUPN12.553Assumed Pressure Rating

 

5.7       Operational Management

The wastewater schemes are operated and maintained under the maintenance contract as follows:

  • Contract 1241: Water Services Contract.  Contract is with SICON who undertakes investigations, conditions inspections, proactive and reactive maintenance and minor asset renewals.

Wastewater sampling is completed under an agreement with Food and Health Ltd as required.


5.8       Photos of Main Assets


V3 Doyleston - Photo 1 - Leeston Rd Pump Station.jpg
Photo 1 - Leeston Rd Pump Station
V3 Doyleston - Photo 2 - Doyleston Main Pump Station.jpg
Photo 2 - Doyleston Main Pump Station


5.9       Risk Assessment

A risk assessment has been undertaken for the Doyleston scheme. The key output from the risk assessment is the identification of any extreme and high risks which need to be mitigated. In order to mitigate these risks they have been included and budgeted for in the projects within this LTP. Table 5‑6 details the risk priority matrix and Table 5‑7 outlines the risks for this scheme.

Table 5‑6 Risk Priority Rating

Risk Score​​ Level of Risk Risk Response
> 50Extreme

Awareness of the event to be reported to Council. 

Urgent action to eliminate / mitigate / manage the risk.

Document risk and action in the AMP.

35-50Very HighRisk to be eliminated / mitigated / managed through normal business planning processes with responsibility assigned.
14-35HighManage risk using routine procedures.
3.5-14ModerateMonitor the risk.
< 3.5Low

Awareness of the event to be reported to Council. 

Immediate action required to eliminate / mitigate / manage the risk.

Document risk and action in the AMP.


Table 5‑7 Risks - Doyleston

Risk​​ Action/Project Year Identified 2014 Risk Rating 2017 Risk Rating Residual Risk Rating
Failure of low class pipeworkRenewal: Upgrade last 1km of pipe from Leeston-Doyleston2014121212

The list of district wide risks can be found in 5Waters Activity Management Plan: Volume 1.

 

5.10       Asset Valuation Details

The total replacement value of assets within the Doyleston Scheme is $2,025,568 as detailed in Table 5‑8 below.

Table 5‑8 Replacement Value, Doyleston

Asset Class 1​ Asset Class 2 Sum of Replacement Value
Plant and Equipment ​
$245,882
Wastewater Reticulation ​​ ​​ ​​ ​
Chamber$2,898
Lateral$350,681
Manhole$223,743
Pipe$1,192,404
Valve$9,961


5.11       Renewals

The renewal profile has been taken from the 2019 5 Waters Valuation. A graph showing the renewals for this scheme are shown by Figure 5‑8 below.

​Figure 5‑8 Doyleston Wastewater Renewal Profile

 

5.12       Critical Assets

The criticality model for Doyleston has been updated for the 2021 AcMP. The methodology of the criticality model can be found in 5Waters Activity Management Plan: Volume 1 and it provides details of how the criticality has been calculated for the reticulation assets. Table 5‑9 and Figure 5‑9 below show the calculated criticality for all of the assets within this scheme that have a recorded known length.

Table 5‑9 Length of Assets per Criticality Level

Criticality Bands​ Length (m)
5
Low5,334
4
Medium-Low714
3
Medium76​
2
Medium-High0
1
High0


​​​
​​ Figure 5-9
DOYLESTON Sewer - Criticality map

Open larger map: 'Sewer Criticality'


5.13       Asset Condition

The asset condition model was run for Doyleston in 2021. The methodology of the model can be found in 5Waters Activity Management Plan: Volume 1 and it provides details of how the model has been calculated for the reticulation assets (particularly pipes). Figure 5‑10​ below shows the level of asset condition for all of the assets within this scheme that have a recorded known condition.

​​​
​​ Figure 5-10
DOYLESTON Sewer - Condition map

Open larger map: 'Sewer Condition'

Table 5‑10 provides a description of the condition rating used within the condition model.

Table 5‑10 Asset Condition Grading

Condition Rating​​ Grading
1.0
Excellent
2.0Good
3.0Moderate
4.0Poor
5.0+Fail

 

5.14       Funding Program

The 10 year budgets for Doyleston are shown by Table 5‑11. Budgets are split into expenditure, renewals, projects and capital projects. Expenditure and renewals have been reported on a district-wide basis in Volume 1. 

All figures are ($) not adjusted for CPI “inflation".  They are calculated on historical data, and population growth where relevant.

Table 5‑11 Doyleston Budget Summary

Years​ Projects Capital Projects
2021/2022 -
-
2022/2023 $10,000
-
2023/2024 -
-
2024/2025 -
-
2025/2026-
-
2026/2027
-
-
2027/2028
 -
-
​2028/2029
​-
​-
​2029/2030
​-
​-
​2030/2031
​-
​-
Total$10,000
-


An explanation of the categories within the budgets are as follows below:

  • Expenditure consists of operation and maintenance costs;
  • Renewals are replacement of assets which are nearing or exceeded their useful life;
  • Projects are investigations, decisions and planning activities which exclude capital works; and
  • Capital projects are activities involving physical works.

​Table 5‑12 Key Projects

Account Label​ GL Description  Year 1 ($)  Year 2 ($)  Year 3 ($)  Years 4 to 10 Funding Split *
​Capital Projects
​-
​Greenan Place pumps upgrades
​-
​$10,000
​-
​-
TBC

* ​LoS refers to Level of Service; G refers to Growth

The list of district wide projects can be found in 5Waters Activity Management Plan: Volume 1.

​Discussion on Projects

Projects have been determined based on their:

  • Relevance to the scheme
  • Requirement to be completed under legislation
  • ​Ability to bring the scheme up to or maintain the Level of Service required under council's Asset Management Policy. 

Many projects are jointly funded by more than one scheme and activity.  Each scheme pays a pro-rata share only, equivalent to the number of connections.

Discussion on Capital and Projects

Where relevant, Capital (Levels of Service) and Capital (Growth) projects have been included in the scheme financial details. 

Levels of Service Projects and growth splits have been provided to ensure the costs of population driven works are clear​


<< ​​5-Waters-Volume-3-Wastewater
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​<< ​​Darfield and Kirwee Wastewater Scheme​​​​​
Eastern Selwyn Sewerage Scheme​​ >>​​​