​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​PART A Variation 1 to​ the PDP

​​


​​Clear Filters​​

​​
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Summary of Submission Point
Relief Sought by Submitter
  
REZONINGMAPMRZV1-0001Erith Boyd001Oppose

​Considers that the rural land surrounding Rolleston, Springston and Prebbleton should be retained and that urban spread is not environmentally or visually sustainable. ​

​Not spe​​cified.


V1-0001 Erith Boyd
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0002Craig Chalmers001Oppose

​Considers that intensification of housing will have a negative impact on the areas affected including the feel of townships, related social issues and additional pressu​re on infrastructure. ​​​

​Requests that as little as possible of the intensive housing is adopted​​​​.​​

V1-0002 Craig Chalmers
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0003Amanda Parkin 001Support In Part

​Considers that intensification should only occur in locations and to a scale, that residential amenities are able to be retained and adverse effects that result from intensification can be appropriate​ly planned for and managed.

Apply intensification to areas of Lincoln that have clear access to greenspace and sunlight. With council planning for the inevitable need for traffic and parking infrastructure.​​

V1-0003 Amanda Parkin
V1-0004Withdrawn - Invalid Submission


V1-0005Withdrawn
EIEXPLANATIONHPW30V1-0006Johan Rivas001Oppose

Considers ​higher density residential areas will put more pressure on infrastructure to a greater degree than what it was designed for.  ​

​That Council undertake a proper impact study. ​

V1-0006 Johan Rivas
TRANEXPLANATIONHPW30V1-0006Johan Rivas002Oppose

Considers ​higher density residential areas will put more pressure on infrastructure to a greater degree than what it was designed for.  ​

​That Council undertake a proper impact study. ​

V1-0006 Johan Rivas
REZONINGMAPNewV1-0007Roger and Gwenda Smithies001Support In Part

Considers that the upzoning of land in Rolleston to MRZ should be accompanied with rezoning of land at the urban fringe to rural residential zoning. 

Refer to original submission for full reason.

​​Amend the relevant provisions to allow subdivision into smaller lots (0.5 hectares to 1 hectare) around the fringe of Rolleston, in the area bounded by Selwyn Road, Spring​​ston Rolleston Road, Waterholes Road and Boundary Roads.

V1-0007 Roger and Gwenda Smithies
MRZMAPMRZV1-0008Jeff Elias001Support

Supports the variation but considers that more land needs to be zoned for commercial/retail to support residential growth.

Retain as notified

V1-0008 Jeff Elias
MRZREQ (Rule Requirement)MRZ-REQ4V1-0001Erith Boyd002Oppose

​Considers that 2 and 3 storey buildings on the rural boundary are not appropriate. ​

​Not specified

V1-0001 Erith Boyd
MRZMAPMRZV1-0001Erith Boyd003Oppose

​Considers that medium density housing should be located within the central parts of the townships and not on the rural boundaries. 


Not specified


V1-0001 Erith Boyd
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0017Phil Hughes001Oppose

​Opposes variation in entirety as it is inappropriate in the Selwyn Context.

Delete variation as notified​​​

V1-0017 Phil Huges
MRZMAPMRZV1-0017Phil Hughes002Oppose

Considers that Prebbleton does not meet the definition of a Relevant Residential Zone.  ​

​Vote down this Variation and submit a legislation amendment to Central Government to amend the legislation changing the current list of Tier 1 Territorial Authorities to the Auckland, Wellington, Tauranga, Hamilton and Christchurch City Councils, removing the other District (not City) Councils from the list.​​​​

V1-0017 Phil Huges
MRZMAPMRZV1-0017Phil Hughes003Oppose In Part

Considers the area around Stationmasters​ Way/Edward Law Boulevard corner of Prebbleton (inclusive Central Avenue, William Deans Drive and all internal roads) unsuitable for rezoning, as the surrounding roading network is not capable of supporting the increased demands of traffic movements and onstreet parking.

Reject rezoning of the area around Stationmasters​ Way /Edward Law Boulevard corner of Prebbleton (inclusive Central Avenue, William Deans Drive and all internal roads).​​​​​

V1-0017 Phil Huges
MRZMAPMRZV1-0017Phil Hughes004Oppose In Part

​Reject rezoning the area of Prebbleton bounded by Stationmasters Way/Edward Law Boulevard/Tosswill Road/Central Avenue, as the area is serviced by public wastewater system that is at capacity. Further intensification could lead to significant wastewater hazards with overflows, blockages and damage.​

​Exempt this part of Prebbleton from the Variation​.​

V1-0017 Phil Huges
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0011Helen and Tom Fraser001Support

​Supports the variation, as it encourages development within the existing urban environment and private plan change areas, thereby reducing encroachment and effects on the rural environment. 

Retain variation as notified​.​

V1-0011 Helen and Tom Fraser
GRUZP (Policy)GRUZ-P2V1-0011Helen and Tom Fraser002Support

Supports provision as notified​.

Retain as notified​.

V1-0011 Helen and Tom Fraser
GRUZP (Policy)GRUZ-P7V1-0011Helen and Tom Fraser003Support

Supports provision as notified​.

Retain as notified​.

V1-0011 Helen and Tom Fraser
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0013Jig Dhakal001Support In Part

Su​​pports higher density in a 10 min walking distance to the University Campus as it allows for more housing for students that has higher accessibility and affordability.​​​​

​Amend the density provisions within ​a 10min walking distance of Lincoln University to allow for greater intensification than what MDRS currently provides for, or at a minimum retain the medium density standards as proposed. 

V1-0013 Jig Dhakal
REZONINGMAPCMUZV1-0013Jig Dhakal002Support In Part

Considers that the town centre of Prebbleton is too small and needs to be increased. Considers that council should investigate expanding the town centre. 

Rezone additi​onal land within Prebbleton to Town Centre Zoning​.

V1-0013 Jig Dhakal
MRZMAPMRZV1-0013Jig Dhakal003Support

​Support the urban limit boundary for MDRS​.

Not specified.

V1-0013 Jig Dhakal
UGCHAPTERUGV1-0013Jig Dhakal004Neither Support Nor Oppose

​Considers further recreational areas and greenspace connections should be provided within the Prebbleton, Lincoln and Rolleston townships​.

Request an i​ncrease in recreational/ stormwater zoning for the district in particular the connection from Lincoln to Prebbleton. 

V1-0013 Jig Dhakal
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0015Darren Wilson001Oppose

Considers that the townships are suburban in nature and not amenable to the proposed zoning.​

Delete variation as ​notified.​

V1-0015 Darren Wilson
V1-0012Withdrawn - Double Up
MRZMAPMRZV1-0014Craig Byers001Oppose In Part

Opposes the widespread application of the new rules to the Lincoln, Prebbleton, and Rolleston townships, as it will lead to isolated pockets of intensification. Instead the rules should be targeted to specific areas to consolidate effects. 

​Delete proposed rezoning, and replaced with a more targeted analysis of where the new rules are best applied.​​

V1-0014 Craig Byers
MRZMAPMRZV1-0014Craig Byers002Oppose In Part

Supports the intent of the variation, and therefore considers urban areas outside Rolleston, Lincoln, Prebbleton should be considered to have the new rules applied. ​​

​Amend Variation 1 to allow SDC to consider the principles of NPS-UD when subdivision applications are received for properties outside of the urban areas of Rolleston, Lincoln, Prebbleton.

V1-0014 Craig Byers
REZONINGMAPMRZV1-0018Aaron McGlinchy001Oppose

Considers that areas subject to a private plan change request that is subject to appeal should not be included in the rezoning, as considers that this is an afront to natural justice, and may result in perverse outcomes should the land be rezoned before an appeal case is heard.

​Exclude any land subject to a private plan change request until any appeals to the Environment Court have been concluded.

V1-0018 Aaron McGlinchy
MRZMAPMRZV1-0018Aaron McGlinchy002Support In Part

​Considers that, rather than blanket rezoning of entire townships, Council should take time to put forward a properly planned application of medium density, targeting specific locations and criteria.

Target medium density to appropriate locations, to avoid inappropriate locations and contain the scale of medium density so that infrastructure (which is already under stress) is not further burdened.

V1-0018 Aaron McGlinchy
HPWEXPLANATIONHPW30V1-0018Aaron McGlinchy003Oppose

Considers that shading of neighbours, overlooking of neighbours, narrow streets which cannot cope with further on street parking caused by multiple dwellings with potentially no off street parking, destruction of character, insufficient and/or failing infrastructure, congested transport corridors, and limited public transport could all have been considered as qualifying matters identified and applied in Variation 1 is concerning. ​

That additional qualifying matters be included to limit the extent of medium density development in Selwyn, such as excluding houses over 100 years old​​​​

V1-0018 Aaron McGlinchy
MRZMAPMRZV1-0019Kathryn Pooke001Oppose In Part

Opposes zone change of Hurley Drive, Rolleston and surrounding streets​ to MRZ as it which would lead to congestion and road safety issues due to narrow road width.​

​Reject rezoning of Hurley Drive, Rolleston and surrounding streets​​.

V1-0019 Kathryn Pooke
MRZMAPMRZV1-0019Kathryn Pooke002Oppose In Part

​Opposes zone change of Granite Drive, Rolleston and surrounding streets​ to MRZ as it which would lead to congestion due to narrow road width.​

​​Reject rezoning of Granite Drive,Rolleston and surrounding streets​.

V1-0019 Kathryn Pooke
MRZMAPMRZV1-0021Lincoln Voice Incorporated001Oppose

​O​pposes the inclusion of PC69 area into Variation 1 as the plan change is currently under appeal at the Environment Court. Considers that, as there are no appeal rights for decisions on implementing the MDRS, once the MDRS decision is made, the outcome of the appeal may become moot, or at least problematic, should PC69 be modified or declined.

Reject the zone change from GRUZ to MRZ over the area included in PC69. 

V1-0021 Lincoln Voice
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0022Eldho George001Oppose

Considers that neighbourhoods will be negatively affected by the intensification of housing. Refer to original submission for full reason​.

Delete variation as ​notified.​

V1-0022 Eldho George
MRZMAPMRZV1-0024Robert Claman001Oppose

Opposes housing intensification proposals where they apply to or affect existing properties.  ​

​Delete the Variation. 

V1-0024 Robert Claman
EIEXPLANATIONHPW30V1-0015Darren Wilson002Oppose

​Considers that infrastructure is unable to support additional residential growth.

D​elete variation as notified
V1-0015 Darren Wilson
MRZREQ (Rule Requirement)MRZ-REQ4V1-0020Tina Prince001Oppose In Part

Considers that a 2 or 3 storey house should not be able to establish on the boundary of older, established subdivisions. 

​Amend such that neighbour's consent is required for a two or three storey house proposed beside an established one storey house.​

V1-0020 Tina Prince
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0026Daryl Streat001Oppose

​Considers the Variation will result in a developer-driven approach to intensification. Has not seen evidence that a developer-led approach to housing will result in greater affordability, enhanced environments, nor a more environmentally-friendly society. ​

Delete variation as ​notified.​

V1-0026 Daryl Streat
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0027Richard Christie001Oppose

Considers that th​e MDRS will result in perverse effects and undermines previous investments individuals have made in their homes.​

Refer to original submission for full reason.​

Delete variation as ​notified.​

V1-0027 Richard Christie
V1-0005Withdrawn
REZONINGMAPMRZV1-0028Adam and Sarah Pollard;; Trevor Holder and Westpark Trustees Limited;; Xiaojiang Chen and Ying Li;; Nicholas Patrick Leeming, Simon Shamy and Philip Shamy 001Oppose

Oppose GRUZ of the above mentioned properties (681, 687 and 701 Shands Road and 330 Trents Road), and the block of GRUZ properties immediately adjoining Prebbleton township in its entirety and seek that the land be rezoned to MRZ. The submitters oppose the extension of MRZ to the south of Prebbleton in its entirety if all of the properties within the block bound by Hampton, Shands and Trents Road are not included in the MRZ.

Refer to original submission for full reason

The submitters request that:

- The block bound by Hamptons, Shands and Trents Roads be rezoned to MRZ; or

- Should this first relief not be granted, that MRZ on all of the land south of Prebbleton bound by Hamptons, Shands and Trents Roads be declined; and

- Such further or other relief, or other consequential or other amendments, as are considered appropriate and necessary to address the concerns set out in this submission. ​

V1-0028 Adam and Sarah Pollard, Trevor Holder and Westpark Trustees Limited, Xiaojiang Chen and Ying Li, Nicholas Patrick Leeming, Simon Shamy and Philip Shamy
Variation 1GENNon-DPRV1-0031Elene Anderson001Oppose In Part

​Considers that Council as part of the Greater Christchurch Strategy should enter into discussions with Christchurch City Council and negotiations with the government regarding intensification, rather than notify the Variation.​​

Engage in dialogue with the Christchurch City Council and the government.​

V1-0031 Elene Anderson
UGCHAPTERUGV1-0031Elene Anderson002Oppose In Part

​Considers that there is ​strong community support in Lincoln against the housing development approved by Council and the loss of productive farmland in the District to development. ​

Engage in dialogue with residents and ratepayers and prioritise their needs and wishes in terms of how to apply the intensification directive.

V1-0031 Elene Anderson
LIGHTEXPLANATIONHPW30V1-0031Elene Anderson003Oppose In Part

Considers that dark skies around Selwyn are being impacted by increased sky glow​ in particular from industrial expansion around Rolleston.

​Considers that avoiding or minimising light pollution in planning future development should be considered by Council.​​​

​​Update the PDP to address how Variation 1 will protect the night sky and the West Melton Lighting Control Area. 

V1-0031 Elene Anderson
HHMAPHeritage Setting OverlayV1-0033Gary Arnold001Oppose In Part

Considers that there are a number of original buildings within the original township area of Lincoln and that three-story high-density homes are inappropriate for this area.​

The original township of Lincoln within the four belts and James Street be classified as inappropriate to have the MDRS apply to protect the history and culture of Lincoln. Amend the Variation to exclude all land within the North, South, East and West Belts of Lincoln plus James Street, Lincoln.​

V1-0033 Gary Arnold
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0034Mohammad Rabani001Support

Supports rezoning and MDRS residential standards in their entirety.

​Retain variation as notified.

V1-0034 Mohammad Rabani
SUBCHAPTERSUBV1-0034Mohammad Rabani002Support

Supports subdivision provisions in their entirety.​​

​Retain variation as notified.

V1-0034 Mohammad Rabani
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0035Safeya Rabani001Support

Considers that the proposed MRZ is a positive step for the development of Rolleston and that the erection of three dwellings per site will increase the residential population and community of Rolleston while retaining rural land which otherwise may be at risk.

​Retain variation as notified.

V1-0035 Safeya Rabani
SUBCHAPTERSUBV1-0035Safeya Rabani002Support

Considers that the new subdivision rules, objectives, and rule requirements will be a positive step for the development of Rolleston and that the further subdivision of lots will increase the residential population and community of Rolleston while retaining rural land which otherwise may be at risk.

​Retain variation as notified.

V1-0035 Safeya Rabani
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0036Lois Sherriff001Support In Part

Considers that should the MDRS be applied, they should apply only to new builds in new suburbs of Selwyn and should not apply to existing housing areas.

​Not specified.

V1-0036 Lois Sherriff
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0037Ron de Vries001Support

Considers that the Variation provides alternative types of accommodation that are desperately needed in the Lincoln township.​

Retain variation as notified

​V1-0037​ Ron de Vries
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0038Jeff Heyl001Oppose

Considers the Variation is entirely unnecessary for Selwyn District, and that intensification solves no problems relevant to Selwyn. Considers that the MDRS are intended to address Auckland's housing shortage.​​ 

Considers that there is high demand for housing in Selwyn but it is far from a crisis and that there are many properties for sale from bare land through to both old and new completed housing.​​​

D​elete variation as notified​

V1-0038 Jeff Heyl
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0039Sandy Vries001Support

Supports the variation in relation to Lincoln Township as notified.

Retain variation as notified​

V1-0039 Sandy Vries
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0040Geoffrey Cooke001Oppose In Part

Considers that the way in which Council has applied the MDRS to the provisions of the ODP will see a proliferation of buildings other than the dwellings or principal buildings for people. Considers that this will allow existing residential property owners the opportunity to increase the capacity of garages and accessory buildings within the provisions of the MDRS. ​

Amend exiting provisions so that they are not superseded in their entirety, and that existing provisions remain for existing residential properties, unless the Dwelling or Principal Building is modified using the MDRS to increase principal living space.

V1-0040 Geoffrey Cooke
GRZMAPGRZV1-0041Mark Howard001Support

​Supports zone change of LLRZ area next to Iris Taylor Avenue to GRZ.

Refer to original submission for further details. 

Rezone LLRZ area along Iris Taylor Ave to GRZ​.

V1-0041 Mark Howard
Variation 1GENNon-DPRV1-0042Jason Horne001Oppose

Considers that the cost of improving water supply infrastructure should be placed on new subdivisions, rather than existing rate payers. ​​

D​elete variation as notified​

V1-0042 Jason Horne
MRZMAPMRZV1-0042Jason Horne002Oppose

​Considers that the roading around Dunns Crossing/Burnham School Road, particularly the intersection of Dunns Crossing and Main South Road is overly congested and dangerous. These intersections do not need additional traffic frequenting them.

D​elete variation as notified
V1-0042 Jason Horne
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0042Jason Horne003Oppose

​Considers that increased density in housing leads to increase of environmental noise, transport, lawn mowers, people etc. This all leads to a decrease in living conditions and potential issues between neighbours/communities.​

D​elete variation as notified​

V1-0042 Jason Horne
Variation 1GENNon-DPRV1-0042Jason Horne004Oppose

​Considers that proposal does not allow additional space for current schools or any additional school to cater for the additional population.

D​elete variation as notified
V1-0042 Jason Horne
NHCHAPTERNHV1-0042Jason Horne005Oppose

​​Considers that increased density will decrease the amount of permeable surface area to manage rain water considering that Rolleston is on soakage chambers this increase the risk of flooding as we are seeing more adverse weather events.

D​elete variation as notified

V1-0042 Jason Horne
TRANEXPLANATIONHPW30V1-0042Jason Horne006Oppose

​Considers that intensification of housing will have a negative impact on the areas affected including increased traffic and carbon emmissions. 

D​elete variation as notified
V1-0042 Jason Horne
MRZREQ (Rule Requirement)MRZ-REQ5V1-0042Jason Horne007Oppose

​Considers that intensification of housing will have a negative impact on the areas affected including reduced natural sunlight and views.​

D​elete variation as notified​

V1-0042 Jason Horne
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0042Jason Horne008Oppose

​Considers that higher density living is inappropriate for Selwyn.

D​elete variation as notified​

V1-0042 Jason Horne
MRZMAPMRZV1-0043Rebecca Tunnicliffe 001Oppose

​​Opposes MRZ zoning of Trent Park, Prebbleton due to traffic, parking and amenity effects.​

​Exclude Trent Park, Prebbleton from the MRZ​.​

V1-0043 Rebecca Tunnicliffe
MRZMAPMRZV1-0043Rebecca Tunnicliffe 002Oppose

Opposes MRZ zoning of Prebbleton due to amenity effects and as it would further compromise transport links

​Exclude Prebbleton from the Selwyn MRZ.

V1-0043 Rebecca Tunnicliffe
MRZMAPMRZV1-0050Kathleen Liberty001Oppose

​Considers that it is possible to exclude Lincoln from medium-density rules as statistical areas Lincoln East and Lincoln West each have a population of under 5,000 at the time of the 2018 census.​ Refer to original submission for full reason.

​Join with Christchurch City Council to appeal the Medium Density Rules to the High Court.

V1-0050 Kathleen Liberty
MRZMAPMRZV1-0058Jocelyn Humphreys001Oppose

​Considers that Council has erred in its inclusion of Prebbleton as meeting the required criteria for the MRZ.​ 

Refer to original submission for full reason.​​

​Delete the inclusion of Prebbleton under the MDRS rules and retain the existing residential zoning as GRZ, GRUZ and LLRZ.

V1-0058 Jocelyn Humphreys
TRANR (Rule)TRAN-R8V1-0058Jocelyn Humphreys002Support

Considers that as a result of the MDRS there will be increased vehicle traffic movements of private vehicles which will place increased maintenance requirements on the road network. Supports the provision as notified.​​

Retain as notified.

V1-0058 Jocelyn Humphreys
TCZMAPTCZV1-0058Jocelyn Humphreys003Support

​​Supports rezoning of Prebbleton town centre from LCZ to TCZ.

Retain as notified.​

V1-0058 Jocelyn Humphreys
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0074Jeremy Alsop001Oppose

Considers the variation is inappropriate for Selwyn​.

D​elete variation as notified​

V1-0074 Jeremy Alsop
Variation 1GENNon-DPRV1-0074Jeremy Alsop002Oppose

Considers council needs to support CCC's opposition to the policy.​

D​elete variation as notified
V1-0074 Jeremy Alsop
MRZMAPMRZV1-0075Graham Searle001Oppose

​Considers that Prebbleton does not meet the definition of a Relevant Residential Zone.  

Refer to original submission for full reason.

Exclude Prebbleton​ from MRZ

V1-0075 Graham Searle
HHMAPNewV1-0081Adriana de Groot001Oppose

​Opposes blanket MDRS zoning across Lincoln township without consideration to historical/heritage features.

Refer to original document for full reason, including attachment.​

​Amend zoning of historic/heritage sites from MDRZ, adding novel zoning for these sites/features.

Refer to original submission for full decision requested, including attachment.

V1-0081 Ariana de Groot
HHMAPHPW30V1-0081Adriana de Groot002Oppose

Considers most of Lincoln's development to be single-story dwellings with garden areas, amongst wetlands, and considers this housing to be living heritage.​

Amend MRZ zoning within established housing in Lincoln to preserve living heritage.​​​

V1-0081 Ariana de Groot
MRZREQ (Rule Requirement)MRZ-REQ4V1-0086Jo Brady001Oppose

​Considers that the 11m height does not consider the difference in sun in the South Island versus the North Island.

​Amend the 11m height for Selwyn and put in place a 2 story maximum height.​
​​

V1-0086 Jo Brady
REZONINGMAPMRZV1-0094Barry Moir001Support In Part

Considers that the site should be included in the variation, as is would be a more efficient utilisation of land. 

Rezone 828 Ellesmere Road (legally described as Rural Sections 17202, 38995, 38996 Part Rural Sections 10139, 10399, 10644 BLK V HALSWELL SD, CFRs 649/98 4B/749 24A/932 24A/954 37B/526) from GRUZ to MRZ​

V1-0094 Barry Moir
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0097Chris Barrett001Oppose

​Oppose the variation as it is inconsistent with the country feel lifestyle of the district and will reduce, diminish and adversely affect the feel and amenity value of Selwyn's towns, as well as property values. 

D​elete variation as notified​

V1-0097 Chris Barrett
TRANR (Rule)TRAN-R8V1-0101Anne Finch001Oppose

​Concerned about the ability of accessways and private lanes to accommodate additional traffic. 

​​Apply a qualifying matter particularly with relation to access from Cedar Park, Rolleston. 

V1-0101 Anne Finch
EIEXPLANATIONHPW30V1-0105Christine Thirring001Oppose

Considers that the Variation will negatively change the character of Rolleston.

The burden on infrastructure will be greatly increased (water, roading, sewage, electricity etc)

Refer to original submission for full reason.​​​

D​elete variation as notified
V1-0105 Christine Thirring
TRANMAPHPW30V1-0106Victoria Atkinson001Oppose In Part

Considers that increased density along Gerald Street, Lincoln, will lead to issues around onstreet parking and street safety, particularly sustainable modes. 

​Amend to have Qualifying Matters to include no Medium Density Housing allowed along Gerald Street.​

V1-0106 Victoria Atkinson
HPWEXPLANATIONHPW30V1-0106Victoria Atkinson002Oppose In Part

​Considers existing homes as significant investments for young families moving to the area and those who have lived here all their lives. To have these investments devalued by developers is a serious concern.

Amend qualifying matters to not allow MDRS to be allowed on existing older residential sections where dwellings are already in place.​

V1-0106 Victoria Atkinson
MRZMAPMRZV1-0108Andrew Mazey001Oppose In Part

Opposes the blanket application of the MDRS to all areas.

Identify specific areas suitable for intensification on an effects basis to maintain current amenity in existing and planned residential areas.  

V1-0108 Andrew Mazey
REZONINGMAPMRZV1-0109Fiona Thirring001Oppose

Opposes PC69.

Delete provision.

V1-0109 Fiona Thirring
MRZMAPMRZV1-0109Fiona Thirring002Oppose

Opposes rezoning of existing residential zones in Lincoln to MRZ.​​

Delete provision.

V1-0109 Fiona Thirring
MRZMAPMRZV1-0110Nancy Borrie001Oppose In Part

​​Considers that the extent of The Lincoln Medium Density Residential zone is inappropriate and should be limited to the older areas of the township. ​​

​Amend the maps so that only the areas of Lincoln within the walkable catchments of land located along Birchs Road, James Street, Gerald Street, adjoining the Town Centre Zone to Lincoln University, adjoining the University and along Edward Street and within East Belt, North Belt, South Belt and West Belt be defined as MDRS. 

V1-0110 Nancy Borrie
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0026Daryl Streat002Oppose

Considers that a community (Council) led approach which considers the best locations, most suitable soils, societal impact, and environmental impact is needed.​

D​elete variation as notified​

V1-0026 Daryl Streat
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0042Jason Horne009Oppose

Considers that the regulations are not fit for Selwyn.

D​elete variation as notified​​

V1-0042 Jason Horne
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0022Eldho George002Oppose

​Considers that there is no housing shortage in Rolleston. Considers that there is evidence of increased housing supply and that there will be a national housing surplus in the next year at the current pace.​

D​elete variation as notified​​

V1-0022 Eldho George
MRZREQ (Rule Requirement)MRZ-REQ4V1-0022Eldho George003Oppose

Concern about the loss of sunlight and privacy in homes and gardens where 13-meter-high buildings are built.

​Housing intensification rules should have to consider the loss of sunlight trees and urban amenity and how that will affect citizens' mental health.​

V1-0022 Eldho George
MRZREQ (Rule Requirement)MRZ-REQ4V1-0022Eldho George005Oppose

​Considers that building a three-storey apartment building way in Rolleston will increase pressure on roads and services and cost the money.​

D​elete as notified

V1-0022 Eldho George
MRZREQ (Rule Requirement)MRZ-REQ4V1-0022Eldho George004Oppose

​Considers that building a three-storey apartment building way in Rolleston will increase pressure on roads and services and cost the money.​

D​elete as notified. 

V1-0022 Eldho George
MRZREQ (Rule Requirement)MRZ-REQ2V1-0024Robert Claman002Oppose

Considers it is inappropriate to allow a property owner to erect up to 3 dwellings of up to 3 stories high on a residential section. 

​Delete the Variation. 

V1-0024 Robert Claman
MRZREQ (Rule Requirement)MRZ-REQ4V1-0024Robert Claman003Oppose

Considers it is inappropriate to allow a property owner to erect up to 3 dwellings of up to 3 stories high on a residential section. 

​Delete the Variation. 

V1-0024 Robert Claman
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0024Robert Claman004Oppose

Considers that this development could adversely affect existing surrounding properties. Adverse effects include a loss of privacy, shading (loss of natural light), decrease in value of neighbouring properties and an increase in noise​.

D​elete variation as notified. 

V1-0024 Robert Claman
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0024Robert Claman005Oppose

Considers that there is a suitable district plan in place to cope with population and housing growth.

D​elete variation as notified. 

V1-0024 Robert Claman
EIEXPLANATIONHPW30V1-0024Robert Claman006Oppose

Considers that there is an inability of services to cope with intensive housing​

D​elete variation as notified. 

V1-0024 Robert Claman
TRANCHAPTERTRANV1-0024Robert Claman007Oppose

Considers that there will be traffic/vehicle congestion caused by the lack of a requirement for off-street parking to be provided.

D​elete variation as notified. 

V1-0024 Robert Claman
TRANCHAPTERTRANV1-0024Robert Claman008Oppose

Considers that there will be traffic/vehicle congestion caused by the lack of a requirement for off-street parking to be provided.

D​elete variation as notified. 

V1-0024 Robert Claman
MRZCHAPTERMRZV1-0038Jeff Heyl002Oppose

Considers that intensification introduces issues related to congestion and access.​

D​elete variation as notified​​

V1-0038 Jeff Heyl
MRZREQ (Rule Requirement)MRZ-REQ5V1-0086Jo Brady002Oppose

Considers that the recession plane impact of an 11m high structure 1m from a neighbouring boundary will have a greater reduction in light for a neighbouring property in the South Island than it will in the North Island where the sun is higher.​​

​Amend the 1m from a boundary construction to a minimum of 2m for Selwyn.​​​

V1-0086 Jo Brady
MRZREQ (Rule Requirement)MRZ-REQ6V1-0086Jo Brady003Oppose

Considers that the recession plane impact of an 11m high structure 1m from a neighbouring boundary will have a greater reduction in light for a neighbouring property in the South Island than it will in the North Island where the sun is higher.​

​Amend the 1m from a boundary construction to a minimum of 2m for Selwyn.​

V1-0086 Jo Brady
1 - 100Next
​ ​

​​​

​​​