| Residential and Business Development | | | 001 | Oppose | Considers that the request should be declined for the same reasons and justifications as PC73 was.
| | PC82-0001 Tom Parker & Kim Parker |
| Residential and Business Development | | | 001 | Neither Support Nor Oppose |
Submitter lives and farms on Edwards Road and are directly impacted by the plan change.
| | PC82-0007 Lance Field |
| Residential and Business Development | | | 001 | Oppose |
Considers that the Rolleston Structure Plan, which the site is outside of, is still relevant and should be adhered to, as there is plenty of undeveloped land within the structure plan area and therefore no reason to expand Rolleston past the Dunns Crossing boundary.
| | PC82-0009 Linda Woltersdorf |
| Transport Networks | | | 001 | Support In Part |
Supports in principle the residential expansion of Rolleston, but considers additional measures are required to minimise the effects of development on rural activity.
|
That prior to development commencing that Edwards Road be sealed. That all development of the site occur from a single entrance from Brookside Road.
| PC82-0010 Stonehenge Trust |
| Transport Networks | | | 001 | Oppose | Concerned about speed of traffic down Dunns Crossing Road, and lack of pedestrian pathways.
| Decline the Plan Change.
| PC82-0002 Michael Green |
| Transport Networks | | | 001 | Oppose | Concerned about speed of traffic down Dunns Crossing Road, and lack of pedestrian pathways.
| Decline the Plan Change.
| PC82-0003 Karen Green |
| Transport Networks | | | 001 | Oppose | Concerned that roading is not sufficient for the increase in traffic.
| Decline the Plan Change.
| PC82-0004 Charlaine McConachy |
| Transport Networks | | | 001 | Oppose | Opposes rezoning to the south of Dunns Crossing Road until the road and surrounding roads are upgraded to manage increase in traffic. Considers that speed limits will need to be lowered. Concerned about safety of Dunns Crossing Road and Main South Road intersection and impact of additional traffic on safety, as well as increased congestion and lack of public transport. Also concerned that costs of upgrades will fall on ratepayers.
| Reject the plan change until a suitable, efficient and effective transport network has been planned, accepted and financed to accommodate the plan change.
| PC82-0005 Malcolm & Jan Douglas |
| Transport Networks | | | 001 | Oppose | Concerned that roads are too narrow for additional traffic and West Rolleston School Road is already congested at peak times.
| | PC82-0006 ohn William Rangi Chaston Whakaki Munro |
| Residential and Business Development | | | 001 | Neither Support Nor Oppose | Considers that the plan change may set a precedent for development outside of existing planned areas, making planning for school capacity and networks increasingly difficult. Considers that Policy 8 of the NPS-UD should be balanced against other parts of the NPS-UD including requirement to ensure additional infrastructure, including schools, is provided.
| Only approve the plan change if the potential inconsistencies between Policy 8 of the NPS-UD and the CRPS are satisfactorily resolved as it relates to development capacity and well-functioning urban environments.
| PC82-0008 Ministry of Education |
| Transport Networks | | | 001 | Neither Support Nor Oppose | Concerned that if the roading network is not upgraded, or managed appropriately, the safe and efficient access to Burnham Military Camp could be affected. Notes that the transport assessment relies on road network upgrades which have not yet been confirmed.
| That the effects on the transport network, including in the vicinity of the Burnham Military Camp, are considered.
| PC82-0011 New Zealand Defence Force |
| Residential and Business Development | | | 001 | Support | Considers that eventual development to Selwyn Road to the south and Edwards Road to the west (or south-west) would create sensible edges, provide additional housing options, and form part of a logical extension to Rolleston while maintaining a consolidated urban form for the future. Therefore supports provisions for road connection with adjoining land.
| Approve the plan change, subject to the ODP continuing to include roading connections from the site to the land that constitutes the remained of the block to the Selwyn Road/Edwards Road corner.
| PC82-0012 Hill Street Limited |
| Transport Networks | | | 001 | Oppose | Concerned about the capacity of the Dunns Crossing Road/Walkers Road/ State Highway 1 intersection to accommodate additional vehicle movements resulting from development of the site, including in combination with additional vehicle movements resulting from other proposed plan changes in the wider area. States that consideration should be given to potential cumulative impacts where plan change applications are outside the Project Infrastructure Boundary.
| Suitably address the issue raised before determining whether the plan change is approved.
| PC82-0013 Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency |
| Residential and Business Development | | | 001 | Oppose | Considers that as the site is outside the area anticipated for urban development, the plan change will not give effect to the CRPS. As a change to the CRPS has not been sought, in the submitter's view the plan change must be declined.
| Decline the plan change unless concerns outlined in submission are addressed.
| PC82-0014 Christchurch City Council |
| Residential and Business Development | | | 001 | Oppose | Considers that PC82 is inconsistent with various provisions in the CRPS and the strategic sub-regional land use and infrastructure planning framework for Greater Christchurch. Considers that the NPSUD does not negate the urban growth framework in the CRPS and the obligation to give effect to it. Considers it has not been sufficiently demonstrated that the proposed plan change will contribute to a well-functioning urban environment, or is or will be well connected.
| Decline the Plan Change. Without prejudice to the relief sought that the plan change be declined in its entirety, if the plan change is not declined, seeks changes to the plan change to address issues raised in this submission.
| PC82-0015 Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury) |
| Transport Networks | | | 001 | Oppose | Concerned that the roading infrastructure is not suitable for the proposed development, including the Dunns Crossing Road/State Highway 1 intersection, the Selwyn Road and Goulds Road intersection, and narrowness of carriageways.
| | PC82-0016 Ivan G Robertson |
| Transport Networks | | | 001 | Oppose | Concerned about the increase in population and additional demand that would place on West Rolleston School.
| Decline the Plan Change.
| PC82-0016 Ivan G Robertson |
| Transport Networks | | | 001 | Oppose | Concerned about the increase of traffic in and around West Rolleston School and surrounding areas and on the roading system.
| Decline the Plan Change.
| PC82-0017 Jason Horne |
| Quality of the Environment | | | 002 | Oppose |
Concerned about the impact of development, including medium density housing, on the rural character of the residential area opposite the site. Considers that there are plenty of other sites suitable for higher-density housing.
| | PC82-0009 Linda Woltersdorf |
| Quality of the Environment | | | 002 | Oppose | Has concerns about negative aspects in terms of infrastructure, roading, schooling, further rural and environmental damage, a standalone parcel of land remote from the Rolleston township, improper relevance in the wider context of the Christchurch City Councils long term planning, etc.
| | PC82-0001 Tom Parker & Kim Parker |
| Residential Density | | | 002 | Oppose | Considers that an increase in high density housing will encourage more crime in the area.
| Decline the Plan Change.
| PC82-0002 Michael Green |
| Residential Density | | | 002 | Oppose | Considers that an increase in high density housing will encourage more crime in the area.
| Decline the Plan Change.
| PC82-0003 Karen Green |
| Quality of the Environment | | | 002 | Oppose | Concerned about impacts of construction, including machinery, dust, noise and traffic.
| Decline the Plan Change.
| PC82-0004 Charlaine McConachy |
| Water | | | 002 | Oppose | Concerned about the impact of the Plan Change on water supply and water pressure for existing residents in the west of Rolleston township.
| Reject the plan change until a suitable, efficient and effective water supply has been planned, accepted, approved and financed to accommodate the plan change.
| PC82-0005 Malcolm & Jan Douglas |
| Utilities | | | 002 | Oppose | Concerned that request will place extra stress on amenities such as water and sewage.
| Decline the Plan Change.
| PC82-0006 ohn William Rangi Chaston Whakaki Munro |
| Community Facilities | | | 002 | Neither Support Nor Oppose | Concerned about the increase in population in West Rolleston, and the resulting increase in school children. Notes that consultation with the submitter has not occurred.
| Only approve the plan change if adequate consideration is given to ensuring there is sufficient capacity within the existing school network to accommodate school aged children, or enabling provisions are provided within the ODP such as provisions for a new school site.
| PC82-0008 Ministry of Education |
| Quality of the Environment | | | 002 | Support In Part | Supports in principle the residential expansion of Rolleston, but considers additional measures are required to minimise the effects of development on rural activity.
| That consideration be given to the effects on farming on the urban rural boundary either by:
- Rezoning land south of Edwards Road to a rural residential or inner plains zoning as adopted on Rolleston's other rural urban boundaries
- Or measures are taken to minimise the impact of the development on uses south of Edwards Road. | PC82-0010 Stonehenge Trust |
| Quality of the Environment | | | 002 | | Burnham Military Camp is defined as strategic infrastructure and regionally significant infrastructure in the Canterbury Regional Policy Statement. This includes policy direction requiring that new development does not affect the efficient operation, use, and development of strategic/regionally significant infrastructure, including management of reverse sensitivity effects. Seeks to ensure that the operation of Burnham Military Camp is not affected by this Plan Change, particularly in terms of reverse sensitivity effects from locating activities that might be sensitive to effects generated by the Military Camp.
| If the plan change is accepted and development proceeds, apply a no-complaints covenant to all new titles created.
| PC82-0011 New Zealand Defence Force |
| Residential and Business Development | | | 002 | Oppose | States that the Plan Change site is outside the Projected Infrastructure Boundary and not within a Future Development Area. However, consideration of the weight to be given to the CRPS should be considered in the context of the NPSUD. If the request does not align with the intentions of the NPSUD and provisions of the CRPS, then it may necessitate further consideration of the approval of the proposal.
| Suitably address the issue raised before determining whether the plan change is approved.
| PC82-0013 Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency |
| Residential and Business Development | | | 002 | Oppose | Considers that the Plan Change is not consistent with Policy 8 of the NPSUD as the proposal will not add significant development capacity or contribute to a well-functioning urban environment, and will therefore not give effect to the NPSUD and in the submitter's view must be declined.
| Decline the plan change unless concerns outlined in submission are addressed.
| PC82-0014 Christchurch City Council |