| | PC68-0001 | Amelia Bunting | 001 | Support | | | |
| | PC68-0002 | Donovan Taynton | 001 | Oppose |
Infrastructure - Prebbleton does not have the adequate infrastructure to accommodate more housing yet such as school, roads, shopping.
| | |
| | PC68-0003 | Tayla Wright | 001 | Neither Support Nor Oppose | Empty - no reasons given
| | |
| | PC68-0004 | Stephanie Broomhall | 001 | Oppose | Village character - The proposed development through plan change will adversely impact the rural lifestyle. It will add more traffic to the current roads. The current infrastructure do not capacity to approve these small sections and high density development.
| | |
| | PC68-0005 | Carolina Ceron Miranda | 001 | Oppose | Village character - Effects on clearly defined urban limits. Effects on the rural amenity, outlook, and environment.
| | |
| | PC68-0006 | Xaojiang Chen | 001 | Oppose | Neighbour consultation - Formal consultation with the owner (the submitter) of the property 330 Trents Road, has never happened for the Plan Change 68. However, the Plan Change Request (P68) report states that the owner has "chosen not to be part of the request for rezoning."
| Assessment against Policy B4.3.3 and confirmation of geographic boundaries must be provided, as requested in the council's RFI (Item 1, 2 & 3). Signed consent forms from all neighbouring property owners must be required as a part of the plan change application.
| |
| | PC68-0006 | Xaojiang Chen | 002 | Oppose | Neighbour consultation - The two blocks include several other property owners, not just the two businesses mentioned in the report.
| Signed consent forms from all neighbouring property owners must be required as a part of the plan change application.
| |
| | PC68-0006 | Xaojiang Chen | 003 | Oppose | Urban form and density - It is inappropriate to develop low density or medium density lots between the rural residential style development area and the rural area at the south of Hamptons Road. The majority of the land opposite the site north of Trents Road is dominated by rural-style residential development with lots size varying between 5000 m2 and 1.2 ha. This area contains the Kingcraft Drive “Existing Development Area” (EDA).
| Assessment against Policy B4.3.3 and confirmation of geographic boundaries must be provided, as requested in the council's RFI (Item 1, 2 & 3). As requested in the council's RFI (Item 11), the urban environment is considered to encompass all of Greater Christchurch. Therefore, it must be provided an assessment of how the request would contribute to the function of the wider urban environments of Prebbleton township, the surrounding district, and the Greater Christchurch area.
| |
| | PC68-0006 | Xaojiang Chen | 004 | Oppose | Infrastructure - It states that "Primary stormwater from the site will be discharged to ground via soak holes on individual sites. Secondary flow will run through the site via swales along the road and reserve networks and discharged to soak holes within the site."
There are privately owned drink water supply bores near the site, for example, the drink water supply bore of my property located within 5 meters of the development site boundary. The effects to these bore's water quality from the stormwater discharge must be assessed and relevant rules from the council and Environment Canterbury be applied.
| The assessment of environmental effects must include the effects to the privately owned drink water supply bores.
| |
| | PC68-0006 | Xaojiang Chen | 005 | Oppose | Neighbour consultation - It states that "The applicants have also undertaken consultation with the neighbouring landowners. Generally the neighbours are either supportive or ambivalent about the plan change." I have lived in the property of 330 Trents Road for five years and have never been formally consulted on the proposed plan change.
| Signed consent forms from all neighbouring property owners must be required as a part of the plan change application.
| |
| | PC68-0006 | Xaojiang Chen | 006 | Oppose | Urban form and density - The plan change has not considered the direct impacts on 330 Trents Road that have 2 ha of grazing paddocks and other rural-style residential properties and businesses. The proposed ODP in the plan change application includes medium density residential lots against boundary of 330 Trents Road Property and a nearby collector road.
| Decline the plan change. The council should assess the plan change application against the Policy B4.3.3 and other regional and local plans. More consideration should be given to the impact of the plan change on the properties in the surrounding area.
| |
| | PC68-0006 | Xaojiang Chen | 007 | Oppose | Urban form and density - The area (Penberley Road & Haughty Place) on the other side of Trents Road has been subdivided into residential lots with an average lot size of 5000 square meters. Kingcraft Drive EDA has an average lot size of 10000 square meters. Development of large-lot residential properties in the Subject Area will preserve most of the existing site features and trees, and will enhance amenity value of this area.
| Decline the plan change. The area between Trents Road and Hamptons Rd, between Shands Road and Springs Road, excluding existing urban development areas, should be specified as a Specific Control Area, with an average lot size of 2000 - 5000 square meters.
| |
| | PC68-0007 | Mark Larson | 001 | Support | The submitter fully Supports the plan change
| | |
| | PC68-0008 | Jonelle Bowman | 001 | Oppose | Traffic safety - The proposed plan change increases the traffic onto already dangerous roads which includes Shands Rd, Hamptons Road, Trents Road and Springs Road. Springs Road is more dangerous because it goes through Prebbleton township.
| Provide additional evidence that traffic flow through Prebbleton can be managed safely.
| |
| | PC68-0008 | Jonelle Bowman | 002 | Oppose | nfrastructure - The submitter is concerned that the Prebbleton Primary School, other primary school and Lincoln High School may not have adequate capacity to accommodate the increasing number of children.
| Consultation with Ministry of Education & local schools for advice
| |
| | PC68-0008 | Jonelle Bowman | 003 | Oppose In Part | Urban form - There would be an isolated block of 5 properties on Trents Road that will remain Rural Inner Plains Zone, surrounded on three sides by potentially Living Z zoned land. The blocks have businesses and rural lifestyle blocks with livestock, machinery, tractors, industrial hedge trimming & fires that are immediately surrounded by residential homes.
| Amend to include the 5 blocks into the zoning request to keep residential environment consistent with immediate neighbouring properties.
| |
| | PC68-0008 | Jonelle Bowman | 004 | Oppose In Part | Urban form and density - The submitter is concerned that the volume of proposed sections are too high for land that are adjacent to Rural Inner Plains land.
| | |
| | PC68-0008 | Jonelle Bowman | 005 | Oppose In Part | Traffic - The submitter is concerned for the unsafe pedestrian access along Trents road to the new proposed road access into the subdivision.
| Amend to include footpaths continually along Trents road to the access road.
| |
| | PC68-0008 | Jonelle Bowman | 006 | Oppose In Part | Neighbour consultation - There was lack of consultation by developers with all the owners to include the five two-hectare blocks on Trents Road into overall zoning change.
| Amend to include the five blocks into zoning change.
| |
| | PC68-0009 | Richard Bowman | 001 | Oppose In Part | Neighbour consultation - there was inadequate consultation with neighbours regarding inclusion within the plan change
| Amend the plan change to include the 10 ha block.
| |
| | PC68-0009 | Richard Bowman | 002 | Oppose In Part | Reverse sensitivity - having residential neighbours will limit the ability to undertake productive rural activities.
| Amend the plan change to include the 10 ha block.
| |
| | PC68-0009 | Richard Bowman | 003 | Oppose In Part | Urban form - Include the 10ha rural block to create a more integrated area with roading connections
| Amend the plan change to include the 10 ha block.
| |
| | PC68-0010 | Mark Rhodes | 001 | Support | Housing supply - The plan change would create space for people to buy houses and be part of the community. The rezoning would benefit the community through more parks, footpaths, wider roads with reduced speed limits down Trent's and Hamptons Road.
| | |
| | PC68-0012 | David Somerfield | 001 | Oppose | Neighbour consultation - The applicant has not made any contact with the submitter who is an adjoining landowner.
| Plan Change to be declined. If Plan Change is to be approved, rules and ODP amendments would be needed. a. Minimum lot size for any allotments created adjoining submitter’s property at 382 Trents Road and other properties zoned Inner Plains/General Rural be a minimum of 5000m2 b. Lots adjoining our property must have a buffer zone (no build zone/building restriction in accordance with the New Zealand Standard 8409:1999: Code of practice for the management of agrichemicals, August 1999. This standard recommends for sensitive areas (i.e. Residential areas) that a buffer zone of more than 100 metres is imposed to ensure the risk to human health is low. c. A Council covenant (or consent notice through the subdivision consent process) to be registered on the resultant titles for any new allotments adjoining our property to prohibit property owners complaining about existing rural land uses on surrounding properties (no complaints covenant). d. Any access from the rezoned land on Trents Road is deferred until the upgrade of the Trents Road/Shand Road intersection and widening of Trents Road is completed to reduce congestion and accident risk at that intersection. e. The outline development plan is subject to a flood hazard risk assessment and appropriate flood risk reduction design is incorporated into any development design and future residential dwellings. f. An assessment of the existing quality and quantity of groundwater in the area is undertaken and the effect of the proposed development on the groundwater supply commissioned. g. Prior to any final designs for residential development of the site is being approved by Council, i.e. through the subdivision process, that we are notified and provided with the opportunity to comment on the final proposal.
| |
| | PC68-0012 | David Somerfield | 002 | Oppose | Reverse sensitivity - The submitter operates a long-established plant nursery adjacent to the site. The normal activities includes, noise, dust, odour, sprays, and truck movements that are appropriate in a rural environment but that may generate complaints from new residential neighbours.
| | |
| | PC68-0012 | David Somerfield | 003 | Oppose | Infrastructure - The submitter's nursery business uses an onsite bore that is 18 metres deep. Over the 2 to 3 years, there has been a decline in available water volume at times. Drawing more water to service the proposed residential development could have a significant effect on the water available for our house and business.
| | |
| | PC68-0012 | David Somerfield | 004 | Oppose | Urban form and density - The proposal will have negative impact as higher urban form will establish adjacent to lands currently zoned as Inner Plains/General Rural Zoning. The proposed rezoning will result in loss of rural character and rural visual amenity and loss of productive lands.
| | |
| | PC68-0013 | Andrew Dollimore | 001 | Oppose | Urban form - This land is outside the residential areas in the GCUDS and the SDP. Furthermore, this land is inner plains, which the SDP protects. Accordingly, this proposal is inconsistent with all the medium term and long planning collateral for this area. If SDC planning collateral is going to have any credibility this application must be declined.
| | |
| | PC68-0013 | Andrew Dollimore | 002 | Oppose | Village Character - This plan change would add 820 houses to Prebbleton. Such increase in housing units would significantly change the nature of Prebbleton.
| | |
| | PC68-0013 | Andrew Dollimore | 003 | Oppose | Infrastructure - The development arising from the plan change would add significant demand on Prebbleton's three waters. Ratepayers should not have to incur any costs in this regard.
| | |
